Soaps and Cleansers

Clean
Soaps

Skin is the largest organ on our bodies. As with anything else if treated well it performs well.

 

Tragically many popular soaps contain untested chemicals that can be absorbed through your skin. Anti-bacterial soaps often contain triclosan, an endoctrine disrupter that is also used as a pesticide!  Scents added to soaps and other products are almost always chemically-derived and can damage nerves.

 

By switching to natural soaps you can protect yourself from these chemicals and pesticides. If you wish the extra protection from viruses, bacteria and moulds (molds) for your general cleaning, laundry, dishes, bath, shower and sink, just ask! Our solution has been proven strong enough to defeat the "super bugs" that are resistant to most modern antibiotics! It has been used for hundreds of years. And it is safe -because it is purely plant derived, it is organic, and it is therapeutic grade.

Soapy problems
Liquid trouble

This soap is a popular brand, found in many bathrooms. Like many other brands it contains chemicals that are absorbed into your skin, chemicals that may harm you. Compare the list of chemicals on your bottle of liquid soap, toothpaste, shampoos, conditioners and other bathroom items to that found on the page Personal Health (under "chemicals"). In addition, if the word "perfume" is found on any of them beware! You or your children could be damaging your nervous systems!

A movement is building to ban two of the most popular chemicals found in personal care products. Read this CBC report

Mon

25

Nov

2013

Residue of popular herbicide likely encourages illness

Glysophate
Glysophate

A chemical and food company wants us to believe that glysophate, a widely-used herbicide, is not only safe -it might be used to treat cancer!

 

How profitable, as it may also increase your risk for cancer.

 

Glysophate is considered to be toxic to animals, including humans. A study by two independent scientists, published in Entropy April 2013, connects the increasingly widespread use of glyphosate with modern diseases because of its "inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, an overlooked component of its toxicity to mammals. CYP enzymes play crucial roles in biology, one of which is to detoxify xenobiotics. Thus, glyphosate enhances the damaging effects of other food borne chemical residues and environmental toxins."

 

In other words, it slowly induces disease.

 

"Consequences are most of the diseases and conditions associated with a Western diet, which include gastrointestinal disorders, obesity, diabetes, heart disease, depression, autism, infertility, cancer and Alzheimer’s disease."

 

A copy of the whole report can be found under the link GMO's.

 

Conclusion: only eat organically grown food or foods known not to have been sprayed with Round-up Ready herbicide. Consider also helping your cells to repair from this damage by using Asea.

0 Comments

Tue

26

Feb

2013

Ending the Junk Food Obsession

Eating healthy
Eating healthy

We all know that smoking tobacco is bad for our health. With both public pressure and far higher taxes, smoking is (thankfully) on the decline in Canada.

 

Now we are facing the crushing health effects of junk food and beverages. These are filled with bad fats, sugar, and salt -plus colorants in soft drinks. The results are alarming: rapidly rising rates of obsity, diabetes, heart conditions, cancer, and far more. Our health care system can't keep up. It turns out that a tobacco company is the largest junk food company! Even the most ardent libertarian (who dislikes government intervention in our lives) may have to concede that doing nothing about this epidemic is harming all of us.

 

Thus we may have to do the same thing with junk food and drinks as we did with tobacco: apply social pressure as well as add taxes. We know that banning didn't work with alcohol (and isn't working with street drugs). At least taxing these ills will raise money needed to pay for the freedom to eat and drink ourselves into oblivion. For more information read this Globe & Mail article.

0 Comments